Print this page

Published: 1 September 2014

ECOS@40: still deep, green, with a good dash of science

Mary-Lou Considine

How do you take your science? In 140-character bites, or do you have an appetite for more? It turns out many ECOS readers prefer more than less when it comes to our online stories about sustainability-related science.

The first ECOS reported on heavy metal pollution in Hobart’s Derwent River, use of computers for modelling urban and resources futures, the urban heat island effect, uranium mining and development in the Top End, and monitoring atmospheric CO2 to better understand its relationship to global warming.
The first ECOS reported on heavy metal pollution in Hobart’s Derwent River, use of computers for modelling urban and resources futures, the urban heat island effect, uranium mining and development in the Top End, and monitoring atmospheric CO2 to better understand its relationship to global warming.
Credit: CSIRO

‘ECOS is one of the few remaining sources of trusted, accessible information on science and sustainability that covers the issues in a reasonable amount of depth,’ commented a reader in our online survey late last year.

‘There are plenty of sources of bite-sized, science journalism that skim the surface. ECOS meets a need for more in-depth consideration of issues.’

Another said: ‘I trust ECOS because over the years it has presented an informed and balanced view of science and sustainability. It is engaging and easy to read and doesn't overhype or sensationalise the topics it communicates.’

CSIRO published the first issue of ECOS in August 1974, when Australia’s population was just over 13 million (now it’s 23.5 million). The organisation’s Chairman at the time, James (Jerry) Price, wrote in the Foreword that the vision was to provide ‘ready access to existing scientific knowledge’ for those charged with managing the environment, by offering factual information (ie based on peer-reviewed science) ‘in a lucid and balanced way ‘ within a magazine format.

In 1966, two CSIRO scientists, Joy Bear and Richard Thomas, published a research paper on the fragrance released when first rains hit parched soils. They called it ‘petrichor’, derived from the Greek <i>petros</i> (a stone) and <i>ikhor</i> (ethereal fluid that flowed like blood in the veins of the gods). ECOS first introduced petrichor to the Australian public in this 1976 article.
In 1966, two CSIRO scientists, Joy Bear and Richard Thomas, published a research paper on the fragrance released when first rains hit parched soils. They called it ‘petrichor’, derived from the Greek petros (a stone) and ikhor (ethereal fluid that flowed like blood in the veins of the gods). ECOS first introduced petrichor to the Australian public in this 1976 article.
Credit: CSIRO

That first issue carried a story on CSIRO research to measure CO2 levels in the atmosphere (and remember, this is 1974!). The writer noted that CO2 levels at the time were 320 ppm (parts per million), up from 280 ppm in 1880 – today’s CO2 levels are hovering just below 400 ppm.

During the ‘80s, ‘90s and noughties, ECOS continued to follow up on the issue of climate change and greenhouse gas emissions. Here are some samples:

  1. 1976 – Researchers warned of rising CO2 levels in the atmosphere during the 20th century and the need for more data, including more on feedback effects (e.g. from the ‘albedo’ effect occurring when white polar ice is replaced by darker ocean).

  2. 1987 – We reported on the growing scientific consensus that a general global warming trend was happening: ‘It has become a matter of how to predict the regional details of these changes, rather than determining whether or not they will occur.’

  3. 1991 – ‘How high could the sea rise?’ discussed the uncertainties in predicting sea-level rise over coming decades.

  4. 1999 – ECOS published a ‘greenhouse effects’ special that included threats to coral reefs, agriculture and our unique tree-dwelling wildlife; as well as the prospect of our tropical cyclone belt migrating southward.

  5. 2009 – What happens if we overshoot the ‘safe’ atmospheric CO2 limit? We discussed the limited options available to rapidly withdraw carbon dioxide from the atmosphere through so-called ‘geoengineering’ solutions.

Biodiversity has been a recurring theme in ECOS: Feb-Mar 2011 issue featured stories on the natural riches of South Australia and Christmas Island.
Biodiversity has been a recurring theme in ECOS: Feb-Mar 2011 issue featured stories on the natural riches of South Australia and Christmas Island.
Credit: CSIRO

Climate change is the tip of the iceberg, so to speak, when it comes to recurrent topics in ECOS. Since 1974, our writers and editors have interviewed many thousands of researchers and scanned hundreds of thousands of source documents to report on a huge diversity of topics. Here are some more examples:

  1. In 1976, ‘Can we grow our fuel?’ explored how Australia might produce half its annual requirements of liquid fuels from vegetation by 2000, by producing ethanol from eucalypts, fuel from plant-waste pyrolysis (leaving biochar), and methane from anaerobic fermentation.

  2. 1983: Insights from acclaimed dingo researchers Laurie Corbett and Alan Newsome into the increasing rate of hybridisationbetween dingoes and feral dogs. They predicted that dingoes could eventually disappear as a result.

  3. 1984: CSIRO researchers detect a link between zinc deficiency and Aboriginal health, largely due to the change from traditional bush tucker to a western diet of processed food in remote communities.

  4. 1991: researchers begin a partnership with the Electricity Commission of NSW to identify suitable sites for wind farms. That research involved Dr Peter Coppin and led to two commercial spinoffs – Ecoult ‘wind smoothing’ technology and the WindScape™ wind mapping tool, the foundation of a successful global company, Windlab Systems Pty Ltd .

  5. 2009: ECOS even ventured into religion, exploring faith-based attitudes to environmental and social issues.

In ECOS 159, we explored the social justice imperative behind religious leaders speaking out on climate change, and the ‘rising force’ of young Australians taking action on the issue.
In ECOS 159, we explored the social justice imperative behind religious leaders speaking out on climate change, and the ‘rising force’ of young Australians taking action on the issue.
Credit: CSIRO

As you can see, ECOS has acted like a mirror over the decades, reflecting the preoccupations of science in the areas of the environment and sustainable development in Australia, often before those discussions became mainstream.

It’s an unrivalled one-stop archive of environmental writing and reporting in Australia – and the good news is that, since 2011, ECOS has been made available free, online for everyone to read.

So Happy Birthday ECOS, thank you all the committed editors, writers and production people over the years, and thank you especially to CSIRO for having the vision to get the conversation on the environment going and to keep it going.

Here’s to the next 40 years!

Mary-Lou Considine is the current Editor and acknowledges the significant contribution of previous Editors – Brian Woodruff, Bob Lehane, Bryony Bennett, Wendy Pyper, James Porteous and Michele Sabto – to ECOS. If you would like to sign up for the free ECOS monthly Contents Alert email, click here, insert your email address, and select ECOS from the displayed list of CSIRO Publishing publications. Feedback on ECOS is always welcome – please email the ECOS Editor.







Published: 4 July 2011

Assured sustainability reporting – navigating obligations

Nick Fleming

As the way in which organisations address environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues comes under increasing scrutiny, sustainability reporting is gathering importance and momentum. Yet reporting must be seen as a product of sustainable business practices, not the focus of it.

Emphasis on more robust sustainability reporting is helping to drive the wider assessment and reform of companies’ associated supply chains and logistics infrastructure.
Emphasis on more robust sustainability reporting is helping to drive the wider assessment and reform of companies’ associated supply chains and logistics infrastructure.
Credit: iStockphoto

While sustainability reporting is new territory for some organisations, many leading businesses have been engaged in reporting for over a decade. Indeed, sustainability reporting is typically one of the first vehicles for engagement with the topic and issues of sustainability, often at the encouragement of a few passionate staff.

However, the call for greater organisational accountability and transparency is growing. An increasing number of shareholder resolutions are placing pressure on company boards to ensure they are effectively identifying, disclosing and addressing ESG risks. Institutional investors are already using ESG data to differentiate firms and guide investment decisions.1

Powerful customers are also forcing their suppliers to become more transparent. The classic example is Walmart, which launched a supplier sustainability initiative in July 2009. Locally, Woolworths recently announced its own Sustainable Fish Sourcing Strategy.2

There is also an expectation for assurance. This reflects a stakeholder desire for reports to be relevant, reliable and free from bias, while the reporting organisation wishes to build a case for lower costs for finance and insurance. This all takes time and money; reporting can be a costly exercise and carries risks.

The banking sector provides an insight to the challenges posed by sustainability reporting. In Australia, banks have typically lead sustainability reporting and have performed well against international benchmarks such as the Dow Jones Sustainability Index. Yet this year, the big four banks have been publically criticised over their involvement with coal-fired power stations.3 People ask how an organisation that receives sustainability accolades can also finance environmental pollution. This questions the connectivity between sustainability reporting and governance.

Scrutiny is also being applied by the regulators. The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission has prosecuted cases against companies such as GM Holden and Prime Carbon for overstating their ‘green’ credentials. It’s clear that inaccurate communication on ESG matters presents serious risks to an organisation’s reputation – and that of the rating or assurance agency.

These issues have been behind recent reviews of reporting guidelines and benchmarking methods.4,5 The reviews found that ratings and reporting tend to be backward-looking measures of compliance with ‘good practice’, failing to enable a meaningful assessment of an organisation’s ability to create and sustain value, in the short and longer term.

What’s lacking is adequate interrogation and reporting of the strategic capabilities and the core competencies required to underpin business continuity and delivery of sustainable outcomes; that is, a truly sustainable enterprise.

However, the push for integrated financial and non-financial (sustainability) reporting may offer a silver lining – the trigger to focus conversations among executives and boards about the things that will drive genuine business continuity, profitability and sustainability. Without these conversations, there will neither be the understanding, focus nor commitment to cultivate truly sustainable enterprises.

The adage ‘What gets measured gets managed’ remains true; as does ‘It’s what you do, not what you say, that counts’. Reporting without subsequent actions to manage risks and create value is meaningless, and arguably harmful.

While there are growing market and stakeholder pressures for integrated reporting of financial and ESG matters, reporting should only be entered into with an eye on:

  1. material business risks

  2. core competencies for organisational continuity

  3. a core set of meaningful performance measures that offer real insight

  4. integrating reporting into governance

  5. commitment to real action in response to identified risks and opportunities.

Organisations that assume this approach take sustainability reporting beyond a ‘nice?to?have’ PR exercise to a ‘must?have’ business improvement tool. It’s a factor in the superior financial performance demonstrated by ethical and sustainable organisations. Getting it right is good for business – and good for communities.

Dr Nick Fleming is Chief Sustainability Officer Sinclair Knight Merz, leading the application of sustainability thinking in business operations and client services. Through his Sustainable Enterprise column, Nick provides insight to how businesses and organisations are effectively putting sustainability theory into practice.


1 Ernst & Young (2011). Shareholders press boards on social and environmental risks. tinyurl.com/social-environmental-risks
2 tinyurl.com/sustainable-fish
3 Greenpeace (2011). Pillars of pollution. www.greenpeace.org.au/climate/GI-profundo.php
4 Eccles RG, Cheng B, Saltzman D (Eds) (2010). The landscape of integrated reporting: reflections and next steps. Harvard Business School. tinyurl.com/integrated-reporting
5 SustainAbility (2011). Rate the raters: uncovering best practices. www.sustainability.com/library/rate-the-raters-phase-one




ECOS Archive

Welcome to the ECOS Archive site which brings together 40 years of sustainability articles from 1974-2014.

For more recent ECOS articles visit the blog. You can also sign up to the email alert or RSS feed